Last week everything was finally submitted to the CCRC after the covid hold-up.
The PrivateEye magazine have done a very supportive article in there current publication highlighting some of the facts, available from newsagents.
One of the main points being the prosecution relied heavily on evidence from the post office specialists to try and implicate Robin was stealing from the post office although no physical proof of this.
However following recent high court rulings it has seen the CCRC send over 45 cases back to the court of appeal stating the Post Office evidence can not be relied on.
If this is the case then surely the evidence against Robin must be deemed unreliable thus removing the case for theft from the equation.
This been the case then there is no case against Robin as the prosecution always maintained whoever stole the money killed Di.